Chili’s parent Brinker International has finalized agreements in principle to settle infringement complaints from the Beastie Boys and Universal Music. Photo Credit: Saiflee100
Copyright conflicts resolved: Chili’s parent Brinker International has officially moved to settle a pair of infringement actions centering on social media promo videos.
Counsel for Brinker and each of the plaintiffs just recently informed the court (or more specifically courts) of the settlements in principle. Both actions, one filed by the Beastie Boys, the second levied by Universal Music, kicked off last year.
And as noted, the similar complaints revolve around the defendant’s alleged infringement of protected music in adverts. As many know, this type of litigation – which has hit energy drink companies, NBA teams, AHL teams, Marriott (though the company quickly settled), and a number of others yet – is increasingly common today.
But now, it looks as though there will be two fewer suits to track here. Beginning with the surviving Beastie Boys members’ comparatively concise claim, alleging the unauthorized use of “Sabotage,” a May 7th mediation session is said to have delivered a settlement agreement in principle.
As things stand, the appropriate parties say they’re finalizing the resolution’s particulars and intend to formally move for dismissal by July 7th.
Shifting to Universal Music’s comparatively sweeping action – alleging the infringement of a variety of recordings and compositions – a separate May 7th mediation also brought about a settlement in principle. Like in the Beastie Boys v. Brinker’s battle, the major and the Chili’s operator plan to put the finishing touches on the resolution by July 7th.
It probably doesn’t need saying given that the settlements aren’t yet wrapped, but the exact terms at hand are unclear. However, it’ll certainly be worth keeping an eye on the once-off legal expenses identified in Brinker (NYSE: EAT) earnings reports moving forward.
Closer to the present, recent months have brought several additional infringement showdowns involving social platforms, where, in general, song libraries are pre-cleared for personal but not commercial use.
Unsurprisingly, in light of the above-described litigation volume in this area, it’d take quite a while to provide updates on each case. Just in passing, Crumbl is expected to answer Warner Music’s infringement suit by June’s end; WMG’s even newer action against Designer Shoe Warehouse is still in its early stages.
Bringing the final major into the fold, then, Sony Music is alleging largescale infringement on the part of the University of Southern California, which now has until June 6th “to file a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for improper venue,” the docket shows.
Recommended Comments
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.